跳转到主要内容

Rethinking Foundational Beliefs: 

The Great Capital Re-Pricing

Investor Knowledge +   5分钟

Published: July 23, 2026

Share:           

Justin Flowerday, CFA
Senior Vice President and Chief Investment Officer,
道明资产管理有限公司

During the decade that followed the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), investors experienced a rare phenomenon in financial history. They had access to exceptionally low borrowing rates, a vast amount of capital, and liquidity that was readily available. This wasn't for a couple of years. This was a period of time so long that these conditions really began to feel like the norm.

It was anything but normal. 

Extraordinary Times Require Extraordinary Measures 

In the face of the GFC, global central banks needed to act swiftly and aggressively. Interest rates were slashed and balance sheets ballooned. Between 2009 and 2021, the U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed) held its policy rate below 1% for roughly 11 of 13 years, and during that time its balance sheet expanded from under US$1 trillion to nearly US$9 trillion following the pandemic¹. This helped stabilize a shaken banking system and support economic growth.

The persistence of these conditions, however, helped normalize historically low financing costs, even though such environments are highly unusual over longer economic cycles. As a result, they also reshaped investor behaviour. Psychologically, for investors, the cost of capital wasn't really a constraint anymore; it became more of a background assumption. Today, the era of "cheap money" stands out not as a new equilibrium, but as an outlier.

The Aftermath

Today, many of the forces that supported ultra-low rates have reversed. Inflation has proven more persistent than many expected, governments are running larger fiscal deficits, and labour markets remain relatively tight. While the initial rise in interest rates occurred several years ago, the broader implications are still unfolding. At the same time, the global economy has entered a new phase of capital intensity. Significant investment is being directed toward infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI), energy systems, and national security.

The rise of generative AI illustrates this shift. The world's largest technology companies, many of which built their business models around highly scalable and relatively capital-light software platforms, are now committing hundreds of billions of dollars toward data centres, computing infrastructure, semiconductors, and energy capacity. Some industry forecasts suggest that global AI infrastructure spending could surpass US$1 trillion annually before the end of the decade², underscoring the scale of capital required to support the next phase of technological development.

The defining investment paradox of this decade may be that capital is becoming more expensive just as the world's biggest growth opportunities are becoming more capital intensive. Capital is less abundant, and increasingly, it is needed in larger quantities than many investors became accustomed to during the post-GFC era.

When the Price of Capital Matters Again

The return of a meaningful cost of capital changes how markets function:

  • Financing is no longer assumed
  • Growth must be funded more carefully
  • Profitability and cash flow regain importance
  • Balance sheet strength becomes a source of resilience rather than a drag on returns. 

The market response since 2022 reflects this shift. Many of the highest valued speculative growth companies of the prior cycle experienced significant valuation resets as interest rates rose, while companies with stronger cash flows, profitability, and balance sheet strength generally proved more resilient³.

This shift does not mean innovation or growth disappears; Its more about the bar rising. It also coincides with a broader change in market leadership. During much of the low-rate era, investors often favoured business models that could scale rapidly with limited physical investment. Increasingly, however, market attention is shifting toward businesses capable of deploying large amounts of capital productively and generating attractive returns on that investment. Whether in AI infrastructure, electrification, industrial reshoring, or energy systems, many of today's most important growth opportunities are also among the most capital-intensive.

Investment Implications in a Re-priced World

For equity markets, this shift emphasizes differentiation between companies. Companies capable of generating sustainable returns on invested capital stand out more clearly than those reliant on continuous access to cheap funding. Valuations also become more sensitive to execution, not just expectations. Across industries, management teams are increasingly emphasizing productivity, profitability, and measurable returns rather than growth at any cost. This reflects a broader shift in capital discipline occurring throughout the economy.

From a portfolio construction perspective, a higher cost of capital reinforces the importance of balance. The assumptions that underpinned portfolios during the era of near-zero rates may not hold in the same way going forward. Investors may benefit from emphasizing diversification, high-quality businesses, and multiple sources of return rather than relying on a single macroeconomic outcome.

Low borrowing costs were the result of an extreme policy response to a unique period in the economy and financial markets. What's interesting today is that the cost of capital is moving higher just as demand for it is ramping up. Big investment themes-like building out AI, upgrading energy systems, modernizing industry, and increasing defense spending-are all capital-intensive and will need significant funding over the next decade.

For investors, this represents more than a change in interest rates. It signals a broader re-pricing of capital itself. Recognizing that shift and understanding which businesses can thrive within it may prove to be one of the most important foundational investment principles of the decade ahead.


¹ U.S. Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED). Effective Federal Funds Rate and Total Assets of the Federal Reserve accessed June 2026.

² IDC, AI Infrastructure Spending Caps Historic Year at ~$90 Billion in Q4 2025; 2029 Spending to Eclipse $1 Trillion, April 16, 2026.

³ MSCI, Interest Rates and Equity Valuations, 2023; S&P Dow Jones Indices market performance data, 2022-2024.

本文档中的部分陈述可能包含预测性的前瞻性陈述(“FLS”),其中包含“预计”、“预期”、“打算”、“认为”、“估计”和类似的前瞻性表述或其否定形式。前瞻性陈述基于当前对未来普遍的经济、政治、相关市场因素(例如利率和汇率、股票和资本市场)以及普遍经营环境的预计和预测,并假定不发生税法或其他法律或政府管制方面的任何变动或灾难事件。对于未来事件的预计和预测本身受无法预见的风险和不确定性的影响。此等预计和预测可能在未来并不准确。前瞻性陈述并非对未来表现的保证。实际发生的事件可能与前瞻性陈述明示或暗示的事件存在实质差异。包括上文所述各项因素在内的多个重要因素均可能造成这种背离。您不应在任何程度上依赖于前瞻性陈述。

道明资产管理有限公司 (TD Asset Management Inc.) 是道明银行 (The Toronto-Dominion Bank) 的全资拥有附属机构。

® TD标志和其他TD商标为道明银行或其子公司的产权。

您可能还希望了解:

Test - Tune in Now

TDAM访谈播客

创富之道

Market Commentaries